Artificial intelligence and the Somerton Man
I posed this question over on CM today hoping someone might be able to provide an answer.
if AI was proved to be wrong in an answer regarding the Somerton Man Mystery, and in the doing can be conceived this mistake undermines the totality of its response. How can it be corrected?
In other words .. what IA creation can correct an incorrect assumption of another and competing IA creation?
7 Comments
Post a comment
The Somerton Man .. 
Pete…what has the Attorney-General who gave permission for the exhumation of SM, Vickie Chapman, had to say about this ridiculous delay? If anyone should be pissed off about it, it oughta be her. Basically, her orders have been totally ignored.
LikeLike
Guzz .. perhaps she is a knowing party to this long, long official silence.
LikeLike
Yep, you’re probably right. Either she has been “put in the know” and has accepted why the cover-up needs to stand, or she has been frightened off…..seemingly like the Australian media, whose lack of interest in the delay is baffling to ne.
LikeLike
There’s one thing that’s always better than the AI bullshit
That’s your gut feeling about something
Your instinct is better than a computer’s bullshit
Your car GPS satnav is a computer full of bullshit and your instinct tells you when your satnav is wrong
LikeLike
I agree, AI will never have the human instinct of something not being kosher, no matter how hard AI tries to convince everyone.
LikeLike
Clive, can you imagine a court of law accepting an (unattributed) AI argument from either the prosecution or the defence?
LikeLike
In Trump’s 50 state asylum yes, anywhere else, doubts.
LikeLike