The Gordon Cramer challenge and an overdue discussion on an even bigger SA mystery
Yesterday I posted a question on Gordon Cramer’s site ..
https://tamamshud.blogspot.com
I asked if he has ever received any solicited or unsolicited confirmation of his claims that the Somerton Man case was related to secret codes, namely the Morbit Cipher, the Nihilist Cipher and a third cipher: anamorphic cryptography.
I suspect he will not respond ..
23 Comments
Post a comment
The Somerton Man .. 
He writes responses
He writes them as made up followers
LikeLike
GC can’t compete with Dave Morgan’s latest AI Shitbox generated photo of SM dressed to the nines leaning back against Somerton Beach storm wall. Picked up at least eight deliberate mistakes and/or omissions in his attire, not including the ubiqitous Strapps’ striped troussrs worn the day before.
LikeLike
I guess the ‘anamorphic cryptography’ would be a bit of a squeeze?
LikeLike
Looks like I’m still in the good books with GC’s better half. So anything you’d like to comment on at TS/BS I’ll make sure it gets through to the master. Just so long as its praiseworthy of the his fine job of work.
LikeLike
Thanks, but it looks like it had to do with the launch of his new site .. Old boy still won’t answer the question though.
LikeLike
Well, to think that you had the audacity/the nerve to ask GC. to prove, that the SM was linked to those three codes, dear, dear!
LikeLike
Took a squiz at GC’s revamped “Site” layout and impressive to say the least. Serious SM anonymous visitors will appreciate the Danetta (morbit) coded entry format which will doubtless keep it secure from uncouth troll access.
LikeLike
But not those within?
LikeLike
Nor without no doubt!
LikeLike
GC wrote his own comment today 30 Oct
as Anonymous
Says it all about who’s actually writing all the comments
Him
LikeLike
We’ve been through the Gordon = Anonymous conundrum often enough to be now fully alert to his shenanigans Response from the internet police would say it all has all to do with suspicions of BS/TS dishonest blog online activities, hence the server’s use of counter measures, how dare they.. GC would have us believe it has more to do with his Samsung notebook misbehaving and nothing more.
LikeLike
Peteb: month or more back a Brian Werner posted on the CM Jim Beaumont site wondering if Nick might like a Beaumont photo, beleiving it mght have possible bearing ion the children’s abduction 1966. It wasn’ responded which is rather rude though par for the course of course; What’s more something important may have been passed over. I’ve done a bit of background work on said Brian Werner (81) and note that he’s had an interesting innings.
LikeLike
A couple of years ago I started writing about the Beaumont kids and was seriously flooded with a troll infestation .. couldn’t figure out why, still can’t.
LikeLike
Peteb. I didn’t come out of it unscathed either, though for other reasons; You might find the answer to your conundrum in Big Footy’s last posting on the BC case, courtesy of Macka (team leader).
LikeLike
Sad that the Beaumont case is still casting a dark shadow over the “City of Churches”. Like others, I strongly suspect that certain individuals in ‘high places’ know exactly what happened but, naming names would be too risky, even after all these years.
LikeLike
Can’t find fault with your impeccable logic Clive. Well bred Adelaide born, Saint Peter’s schooled, well connected members of SA Sqattocracy in high places, would know exactly what had occurred at Glenelg on that Australia Day long ago and far away. My thoughts have always been along those lines, as I’ve tried to convince anyone at all interested, though without much luck.
LikeLike
We can’t rule out an extrajudicial killing of SM
Seems to be more than likely
Given the fact that nothing can be traced to anyone
LikeLike
Highly probable there’s a dusty file in the SAPOL archives, labelled Beaumont Case on the front cover. Inside the cover is another label, with certain instructions/letters/names prohibiting any further investigation.
LikeLike
You’re darned tootin Clive. No longer anything of Beaumont abduction relevance left on NAA archives either; Apart from digitised war service records for the children’s dad, Grant, their uncle Max and WW1 grand fathers. My several requests to Sapol boss and nominal cold case officers were not responded, to despite advice from SA’s AG that they would be instructed to do so. That was five years ago.
LikeLike
Well, I contacted the SA Coroner’s court in August, this year, requesting information on any results of the SM exhumation. They replied advising they try to reply within 30 days, you can probably guess the result! So, another e-mail was sent to the court again on 22 October, this year. As for both the Beaumont case and the SM case, what is it about both cases, that the authorities are determined to conceal from the public?
LikeLiked by 1 person
I don’t believe that ‘conceal’ be the appropriate word Clive. It’s more than likely the authorities had nothing of real worth to conceal from or share with the public, that being the missing link in both cases. As for your “extrajudicial killing of SM” No. 1, to my limited knowledge that would also include the aiding and abetting of a person’s self harm (suicide) contrary to provisions to wit [s 13A (5)] of SA’s Criminal Law Consolidation Act 1935, from memory.
LikeLike
Dear Mr Clive
Thank you for your email
(Government speak for shove off)
LikeLike
“Shove off” is, I suppose a more polite way of saying “F…off”.
LikeLike