Three lists.Three questions. Three answers.
List one .
Fingerprint card. Tooth chart. Suitcase. One pair of shoes. One pair of slippers. One razor strop. One particle brush. One cut-down knife. One pair of scissors. One dressing gown. Several ties. One card of Barbour thread. One tin of boot polish. One glass dish. One luggage ticket. One tube of toothpaste. One particle brush. One coin. Several envelopes. A pair of trousers. Several shirts. The Boxall Rubaiyat. SM’s bust. SM’s body. The TS code. SM’s grave. His funeral cortège. His coffin. The TS slip. A bus ticket (there may be more but who’s counting?)
List two ..
The Freeman Rubaiyat.
List three …
The Freeman Rubaiyat.
Question 1.
What does the first list represent?
A comprehensive collection of SM case related evidence as photographed and published.
Question 2 .….
.. and the second?
The most important piece of SM case related evidence.
Question 3 …
… and the third?
The most important piece of SM case related evidence was never photographed.
The Somerton Man .. 
Lists 2 & 3-only talked about and, nobody knows the fate of the Rubaiyat. That’s assuming that it existed in the first place. Strange that Boxall had a copy of the Rubaiyat and was quite happy to show it to Littlemore, inscriptions and all. All that was missing was Jessie’s telephone number.
LikeLike
… also missing, her signature which was deliberately covered up
which to me always looked like JEStompson, so I don’t know where Jestyn came from because she never called herself that. The letters said to be y and n aren’t that at all if you look closely and for example compare the p without a loop the same as her other writing found elsewhere. She was dropping a clue because JES is meant to be obvious and JE is Jessica Ellen. So she disguised what it was but she left a clue. That sort of thing paints a picture of her in a bit of a secret world like a spy. To me someone was wild guessing about that signature and didn’t look closely at it. I’d say the reason the signature was covered up is because her name is actually in the signature and she wasn’t married to Prosper but was using his surname as hers as if she was married and at least expressing her intentions to make that so. Relationships like that were pretty much taboo in those days and legally she couldn’t use his surname. Marriages in a church were expected too as a matter of upholding the dignity of the family name. The church had a lot of power over how people behaved in those days. Anything that was considered immoral by standards of the church was taboo.
LikeLike