Skip to content

Three Things

Did the hair Abbott used belong to Carl Webb?

.

Was the man identified in the family photo someone other the Carl Webb?

.

And if Carl webb wasn’t the Somerton Man, who was?

9 Comments Post a comment
  1. davidmorgan20uni #

    Carl Webb had 3 distinct phases – a young ginger haired boy at least to age 13. A blond haired guy for the majority of his life and my guess is to age 41 when Dorothy left him. He changed again drifting back to ginger/grey possibly because he was depressed and didn’t have access to his usual hair-dyer. Perhaps that was his sister.

    We see him on the beach with dyed ginger/grey/dark hair age 43. He may have dyed his hair himself in some train station sink just before death.

    So naturally everyone in Melbourne who knew him saw him as a blond guy. It may have been only Dorothy who would know him well enough seeing his undyed ginger hair under his arms.

    He could have visited the toilets in Adelaide Railway station – dyed his har dark and with ginger/grey showing through.

    He’d always had hair that was longer than normal for society from 1929 (blond haired Carl wth family) to his beach pose with longer ginger hair. Perhaps he was modelling himself on some idea he had of a poet. Swinburne was a long haired ginger guy when young.

    https://imgur.com/gallery/bTuf16b

    It was an observation about the SM that he had his hair longer than was normal for society in 1948. Pathology “rather long for a man”. Nails carefully attended to, “officer class”.

    Like

    May 3, 2024
  2. No One - we still don't know #

    It wasn’t Carl Webb. So that is the question. Who was the man on Somerton beach.

    Like

    May 3, 2024
  3. Clive #

    If it was Carl Webb found on the beach, didn’t Dorothy see his photo in the newspapers-why her silence? The ominous word ‘reconstruction’ of his face comes to mind, hence Dorothy didn’t recognise him?

    Like

    May 3, 2024
    • No One - it's Boxall's face that's why #

      If she was married to Boxall she may have….  :-)

      Like

      May 3, 2024
  4. John Sanders #

    “photographic reconstruction”. That’s what the newspapers said on 3 December ’48, but why would that be necessary in the case of a presumably unmarked two day old body under refrigeration.

    Like

    May 3, 2024
  5. John Sanders #

    If y’man had ginger hair as a kid he’d have been ‘bluey’ for the rest of his days, just like ‘git’ does with the Welsh in Liverpool.

    Like

    May 3, 2024
  6. Clive #

    Exactly, why the need to have a ‘photographic reconstruction’? If the SM had washed up onto the beach, after being in the sea, then ‘reconstruction’, if at all possible would be correct. But, a body two days old? That’s assuming we are not dealing with a second body, which had been switched?

    Like

    May 3, 2024
    • J.RO #

      I personally think that’s what happend, the body at the beach was probably decomposing quick and they needed to publish a picture quick, then brainstormed a couple of ideas and behold they find a body dress him up to be SM.

      Like

      May 8, 2024
  7. Did Charlie actually stage his own disappearance with a little help from his friends? Did we ever determine who resided in Seacombe Grove (Jess or Doff)?

    Like

    May 16, 2024

Leave a reply to lonerangeraus Cancel reply