The Somerton Man Code Has NOT been cracked
In order to ‘crack’ a secret code an individual claiming such a success must be able to interpret the code into an understandable text: a message, an instruction, a finding, a secret revealed. Something made plain.
This has yet to be demonstrated and any such claims that the code has been cracked cannot be accepted.
12 Comments
Post a comment





No microcodes in it
That’s just imagination
LikeLike
Has there been a recent posting of the code on one of the many dozens of sites?
LikeLike
Try GC
LikeLike
Problem with it ?
LikeLike
Problem with what?
LikeLike
Tried to load a long reply
maybe there is a number of words limit?
LikeLike
It may have been cracked to all intents and purposes
but I am unable to upload it due to WordPress limit on the number of words
LikeLike
I learnt a long time ago not to pay attention to rubbish sources
LikeLike
OMG, I just visited and nearly died of laughter….
“We are widely regarded as the most trusted fact and evidence-based blog on the Somerton Man case.”
I guess anyone can make ambit claims, but I’m yet to hear anyone suggest it’s a trusted fact or evidence based log….in fact I think it would take me less than 30seconds to find speculation presented as fact there that subsequently proved totally wrong……
LikeLike
Couldn’t agree with you more!
LikeLike
I once suggested to GC that he find a similar publication of the ROK and use his skills to determine whether what he sees in the Somerton Man code, ie micro-writing can be found there as well. He declined the invitation. In my experience I’ve found many second hand city bookshops have a good selection of old pocket-book sized ROKs.
LikeLike
The only “micro writing” is found on a book whose existence is itself in doubt.
LikeLike