Skip to content

19 – An Investigation Bound To Fail.

Try putting this jigsaw together.

Gordon Cramer writes that in 1948/49 ‘they (the police) were a de-facto arm of the intelligence services.’

and this: “I think it likely that the war amongst intelligence operatives was hidden from public view and that its also likely that there were casualties on both sides. But who were the executioners and where did the bodies go? How would these events be hidden? I think you might find a higher than usual incidence of suicide by poisoning.”

John Sanders also has a strong view about the involvement of the intelligence services by using certain members of the South Australian police as their go-betweens and we know that pre ASIO intelligence matters were also treated as local police matters. This being the case there may have been signs showing if a particular investigation strayed from what should have been a relatively straight forward approach, such as the investigation into the mysterious death of the Somerton Man.

So dive in ……

1 The bus and train tickets found in his ticket pocket.

Despite that one of these tickets indicated the deceased was at the Adelaide Train Station the day before he was found it wasn’t followed up by the police, denying them the opportunity to interview station staff while their memories were still fresh.

2 The Barbour Thread

The deceased was conveyed to the morgue on December 1st where it was stripped of clothing and placed on a steel sliding stretcher. The clothing, including the coat repaired with Barbour thread was then stored at the morgue until the time when DS Leane allowed Professor Cleland to take possession of them.

On January 14th, the day the suitcase was discovered, Leane took away ‘some items for checking’ – the assumption being that they were the tools, tie and Barbour thread card (pic) yet there was no record of Leane personally examining the clothing while it was stored at the morgue, what’s more the date given when Cleland reported back to Leane of his findings on the clothing, including the repaired coat and Tamam Shud slip was not until April 19th.

If Leane didn’t know at the time he took possession of the Barbour thread that it was used to repair the deceased’s clothing, then what made him think others would when there were items in the suitcase more suitable for identifying him, like his coat shirt (pic).


3 Fingerprinting the contents of the suitcase.

Despite having the services of James Durham, one of the most distinguished finger printers in Australia and despite that there were many hard-surfaced articles in the suitcase that would have yielded clear prints the police decided instead that the repairs to the deceased’s coat using the same thread as found in the case was enough to identify him as the case’s owner.

Some argue that the thread card was added to the evidence* sometime between the time the body was found and the the suitcase was retrieved which was  noted to be found unlocked, an unlikely event given its near new state and also given that the suitcase key and luggage-ticket stub was not found on the body, neither of which would have been of any value to an opportunistic thief.

*also see 7 and 8

4 Olive Neill’s Watcher.

Ms Olive Neill stated that she saw a man standing on the roadside looking down on the man lying by the steps on the evening before a body was found in the same place. The light was good enough for her to be able to describe the colour of the suit and hat he was wearing and the curious fact that he stood there looking down at the man for about five minutes, uninterested in the beachside panorama and setting sun.

5 Gordon Strapps’ clear recollection.

The deceased was found to be wearing plain faun-brown trousers. Strapps insisted in his deposition that the man he was watching on the previous evening was wearing striped trousers.

6 Detective O’Donohue’s witness.


7 There was not a match to be found on the body.

In Constable Moss’ interview with the local newspaper he categorically and repeatedly stated that there were no matches to be found on the body despite that the deceased appeared to be a heavy smoker and a half-smoked cigarette was found wedged under his chin. Moss also noted there were no scorch marks on the deceased’s chin or on his clothing.**

8 A box of matches was later established to be with the body.

DS Leane contradicted Moss and swore on his deposition that a box of matches was found on the body, effectively silencing any discussion as to how the deceased had lit his cigarette.

**Some argue that when the body was laid out the man who had carried him there positioned the cigarette under his chin but forgot the matches.

9 The Rubaiyat.

Despite its importance to the case it was never photographed and was claimed to be lost early in the investigation

10 Naval Intelligence asked to decipher the code.

Naval Intelligence were given a photograph of the marked up code and a ‘similar’ copy of the Rubaiyat, denying them the opportunity to investigate if the code was related in some way to the book it was written on.

11 The Rubaiyat’s torn page.

Despite its importance to the case it was never photographed.

12 The phone number(s) written on the back cover of the Rubaiyat.

Despite their importance to the case they were never photographed.

13 The Rubaiyat code.

Despite its importance to the case the unmarked code was never photographed.

14 Detective Brown stood aside from certain aspects of the case.

Detective Brown was not involved in any way with the investigation of the circumstances surrounding the finding of the Rubaiyat despite him being a senior figure in the investigation.

15 Publication of the finding of the Tamam Shud slip delayed for 51 days.

DS Leane allowed the newspapers to publish images of the slip only days before the inquest commenced.

16 Coroner says he doesn’t know where the deceased died.

Then adjourns the inquest.

17 Coroner fails to depose Jessica Harkness despite her being a significant person of interest.

Her phone number was written on the back of the Rubaiyat and the police were in no doubt she recognised the man modelled in plaster by Paul Lawson.

18 Coroner rules that the deceased died where he was found.

Then closes the inquest.

19 Dr Dwyer is ‘astounded’ Analyst Cowan didn’t find any traces of barbiturate in the deceased.

But reluctantly accepted his findings.

2o PC Moss did not find the Tamam Shud slip on the body.

But Professor Cleland did while in the company of Analyst Cowan.

21 Analyst Cowan fails to identify the black powder shaken from the particle brush found in the deceased’s suitcase.

Despite being one of the most highly experienced analysts in his field.

22 Paul Lawson watched by the police for the entire period he worked on the cast.

Lawson told Cramer they were there every day.

23 DS Leane’s workload.

DS Leane was described as being directly responsible for overseeing general matters requiring direction together with the supervision of junior investigators and when he was given the job of overseeing the Somerton Body Case with a centrally located and dedicated team of investigators (GF 59) his workload changed considerably, but apparently not theirs.

Leane enquired with the staff of the Adelaide Railway Station about any unclaimed property on the 14th of January.

Later that same day Leane visited the station and sorted through the unclaimed property.

Leane then took possession of some items from an unclaimed suitcase for ‘checking.’

Leane visited the South Australian School of Arts and Crafts to enquire about the possible uses of the tools found in the suitcase.

Leane asked Hugh Possa, tailor, about the origins of the coat the deceased had been wearing.

At some stage Leane gave the property to Professor Cleland.

On the 23rd of July a Rubaiyat with a matching torn page was handed to Leane by its finder.

Leane soon discovered a telephone number written in pencil on the back cover.

Leane also discovered what appeared to be a code faintly written in pencil on the back cover.

Leane, accompanied by other detectives escorted Jessica Harkness to the museum to view the bust.

Leane reproduced the list of capital letters and released it to the media.

Leane sought the assistance of the Navy Office at Port Adelaide in de-ciphering the code.

 

30 Comments Post a comment
  1. Clive #

    Leane took “some items from the suitcase”, items that have not been described or the number involved. These items were removed from the suitcase, which itself remained in the railway station for a few more days. So, what was so important that these “items” had to be removed? Once removed, who else, apart from Leane knew about these items?

    Like

    July 26, 2023
  2. Correspondence? Identifiable items? Address book? Photographs?

    Like

    July 26, 2023
  3. John Sanders #

    Shabbers: you mean you missed news that the family picture was taken at Werribee. It being at the residence of Eliza Webb’s brother Bob Grace of 97 Watton St., located opposite the clearly signposted Wyndam Park bridge. Can’t believe that you of all our Keane FB punters could have overlooked the obvious. Of course our well meaning Surrento Park 1929 baker’s picnic fans would have seen it and snickered long and loud.

    Like

    July 26, 2023
  4. John Sanders #

    Seems you also missed the hot gossip concerning Charlie’s likely pre war employment as a surgical instrument maker with the Melbourne branch of Dr. Harley Foot Appliance Co. under directorship of Pizzy P/L and T. O. Jones Prop. A good reason for Carl leaving that employment at outbreak of WW2 may have been it’s non ‘protected industry’ status, whereas Sher Tools was and would thus allow him to work without risk of being called up to serve.

    Like

    July 26, 2023
  5. John Sanders #

    Ok Shabbs lets cut to the quick as to who might identify with your matronly lady in the Pinny. Stuart Webb has her down as Gladys Keane (bn. 1897), whereas Helen Cass does not seem to agree going by her extensive research leads. My question is, do you have an alternative candidate and if not can you at least guess the lady’s age which I estimate to be about 55 for our mid 30s photo dating…I also have a tentative mysteriy name in mind and I think you might have one also but hold it for now lest others lay claim.

    Like

    July 26, 2023
    • Thanks for the update John, I’m pushed for time due to one in my care being home tutored so not able to read or research as I’d like. The lady in the middle looks 55 to 60 ish I think and similar to Eliza so possibly
      the sister?

      Like

      July 27, 2023
    • John Sanders #

      Shabby #

      Quick as a flash and very close indeed to my reckoning. I’m looking at Bob’s wife Alice for your busy attendant lady of the house in the ‘pinny’ cover-all get up. Alice Maude Grace was born in 1879 so would have been 57 when OUR photo was taken at her Werribee home which would fit the candidate you have alluded. Certainly couldn’t be Stuart Webb’s Gladys Keane who by his 1925 dating of the pic would have been only 28. Yeah sure sport pull the other leg yodels like Harry Torani @ Hopkinson’s black terrier bitch nigella.

      Like

      July 27, 2023
  6. Jessa #

    Long time lurker here, I’m just wondering if anyone has definitively ruled out Roy himself? I know this may sound crazy (or at least incredibly naive) but I swear I’m asking in earnest. Here’s why I’m wondering: a. The DNA (assuming it’s actually from the body in question) points as much to Roy as Charlie. b. There are some compelling physical similarities between Roy and SM (slightly crooked nose that appears to lean toward a lower more outwardly-oriented ear, distinctive neck wrinkling, noticeably large hands, a small nonvaccination-related scar on the left shoulder, etc.). c. We cannot know for sure where Roy’s body is or whether the body attributed to him was actually him (those fiber id tags were notorious for disintegrating in tropical environments). d. Ruby gave birth to a daughter in 1946 who took the name Webb and claimed to be Roy’s child.

    I know there are some considerable issues with this so I’m not exactly arguing that Roy is SM, just wondering if anyone else has thought the same thing? I guess I’m asking whether it’s likely that someone out there looked more like SM than Roy Webb did?

    Like

    July 27, 2023
  7. John Sanders #

    Jessa #

    As fate would have it, just the other day on Cypher Miseries, David Morgan re affirmed to Peter Bowes his long stated belief that the Webb brothers Carl and Roy had swapped identities in 1941, the guist of it being that Carl Webb ended up being buried in Burma Oct. 1943 while Roy stayed home and did his bit making sirens for Sher Tool Co. In re compelling similarities, I feel you be mistaken in that the only reliable comparison photo we have of Carl is as a teenager; Not only that, the uncertain vac. mark that you refer to as being identical to both brothers, assumes that Somerton Man be Roy, a case scenario as yet unresolved…Suggest you might like to discuss the matter further with Dave, he has all the dirty doings and pooings on the Webbs; in fact he’s full of it and that’s no shit mate.

    Like

    July 27, 2023
    • Jessa #

      #JohnSanders, we may only have photos of Carl as a teenager but I’ve been struggling to reconcile his relatively symmetrical ears (in shape, placement and orientation) with the conspicuously less similar & symmetrical ears of SM. Taken with a crooked nose that always favors the side of the face with the lower placed ear, this relationship between relatively stable facial features doesn’t change a ton with age or in death (or unfortunately also the early stages of decomposition). I was kind of creeped out to see the same relationship between Roy’s features in the higher-res version of the enlistment photo. But of course it’s entirely possible (or perhaps more than likely) that I’m just seeing what I want to see, hense bringing it forward to all of you more knowledgeable folk.

      Like

      July 28, 2023
  8. Jessa, Roy was shorter than 5’11 by about 3 inches and I’m still waiting to get my hands on whatever Jsanders has been taking.

    Like

    July 27, 2023
  9. Jessa #

    #JohnSanders
    I really appreciate your feedback re the possible switcheroo, do you think Dave is open to being contacted? As for the scar on SM’s left shoulder, it’s referred to twice in the 1949 inquest. “There was a light scar on the left upper arm” (p15) and “…one scar or boil mark about an inch in size in the upper left forearm” (p27).

    #peterbowes
    Absolutely. The height issue is one reason why I know it sounds insane to suggest it. That being said, perhaps I’m just drinking the same Kool-aid as JSanders. 🙂

    Like

    July 27, 2023
  10. Jessa #

    Ok, last one, promise. I made a video of what I think is another very compelling visual similarity between Roy and SM. I hope it’s ok to share: https://vimeo.com/849170000

    Like

    July 28, 2023
    • Guzz Rating #

      Good video from Jessa.
      Seems the nose is significantly longer on SM.
      I know your lugs are supposed to get bigger with age…but does your conk?

      Like

      July 28, 2023
      • I’d like to see Jesse do the same with SM and that enhanced pic of Charlie

        Like

        July 28, 2023
        • John Sanders #

          Peteb: your inclination for shuffling of posts around to fit a particular trending line of thought or theme be acceptable but, at times confusing which I’m sure is not the intention. If a post be out of sequence perhaps it could be noted as such. Just a suggestion mind!

          Like

          July 28, 2023
        • Jessa #

          Come now #peterbowes, I’m just some rando with access to powerpoint and a dream, not a magician.

          Like

          July 29, 2023
    • John Sanders #

      Jessa #

      Perhaps the “small non vacination related scar” on the left shoulder which you allude to may have be mistaken for lividity below SM’s ears and neck as discussed in 1949 inquest submissions. Only mention of shoulders perse in the coroners roport relates to SM’s rest position against the sea wall and no talk of scaring at all. By your leave may I suggest we might now set aside the left shoulder scarring issue thereby averting misunderstanding amongst the punters.

      Like

      July 29, 2023
      • Jessa #

        #JohnSanders
        To be honest, with what there is to work with I don’t think we’ll ever know for sure either way. I brought the mark on the shoulder up because it is one of multiple similarities that when taken together had me personally toeing the line of coincidence when it comes to Roy and wondering if anyone else felt the same way.

        Like

        July 29, 2023
  11. Jessa …. Lovely stuff.

    Like

    July 28, 2023
  12. John Sanders #

    Jessa#

    I’m sure Dave Morgan would be approachable on anything related to Carl’s substitute service for his older sibling Roy in Singapore-Malay-Siam during ’41 up until his death in Burma ’43, and get you up to speed. He’s a learned happy chappy, genial to a fault and more than eager to help; that’s David.
    Couldn’t find the left shoulder scar you speak of, although there was one mentioned by Det. Leane (P27) inside the left elbow, as well as the three you omitted on the left wrist (small pox?), then of course the unidentified mark on the upper left arm which was also described by Dr. Dwyer (P15) as a vac. or boil mark. As for your SM/Roy comparison pics. I don’t see any likeness apart from the same forhead slant towards the hairline which in SM’s case was likely a causal effect of the standard post mortem cut and fold back proceedure. As for the ears, forget em Jessy..need I say more…ps grape jubie juice be my quencher of choice but, sadly they stopped giving it to us in ’71 due to being a diuretic and it’s related adverse effects on the jungle foliage.

    Like

    July 28, 2023
    • Jessa #

      Absolutely my mistake, am most certainly NOT drinking the same Kool-aid as #JohnSanders (for one, I was born years after this grape jubie juice was discontinued).

      Like

      July 28, 2023
  13. John Sanders #

    Jessa #

    Shame that you couldn’t be around for the good times like having Marlboro Man large as life there on the silver screen with whip in one hand and fag in the other; All that now replaced by a real threat of AI takeover or worse still being killed off by ruskie Wagnerites. I’m glad to have been there when the whips were cracking and ‘wlwtbtoa’ but, I’m for now totally committed on identifying Somerton Man and good riddance to Carl Webb who can go to buggery for mine.

    Like

    July 28, 2023
  14. John Sanders #

    Thanks to Jessa I’ve just come across differing descriptions given to the 1949 inquest by Pathologist Dr. J. M. Dwyer and Criminalist Det. A. L. Leane. On one hand witness barb Dwyer describes “a slight scar on the upper left arm”, whereas Detective Leane attests to it being “a scar or boil mark an inch in size in the upper left forearm”. Question is do they refer to the same lesion or nay; whilst not likely to represent a breakthrough in the case or a game changer, I’ll bet no one ever noticed the anomaly until Jessa happened to swing by loaded for bear.

    Like

    July 28, 2023
  15. Jessa #

    #GuzzRating
    I don’t disagree at all but it’s possible that the video is a tad misleading. See, I had the background digitally removed which was very successful in the SM photo (higher contrast) and unfortunately a bit less so in Roy’s case (lower contrast around the bridge of the nose area) so the profile is not as exact as it could be. At any rate, I’d be happy to make another with Roy’s background intact if anyone would like to see it. It may be that they look more or less similar in the newer video. Regardless, please can someone make sure JSanders has access to his bifocals this time? :p

    Like

    July 29, 2023
  16. Jessa #

    Not that anyone asked but here is my opinion about the height relationship between the various Webbs in the photograph. It’s a really confusing image because there is absolutely nothing that provides us with any way to gauge exactly where the photographer was standing in relation to the subjects. I feel as though this info is especially important in this case because the angle does not seem to be exactly straight on, I get the impression we may be looking up at them somewhat. Whether that is true or by how much isn’t something we can ascertain without more information.

    This brings me back to the video. I was comfortable putting it out there as a serious consideration because what’s missing by way of necessary info in the family group photo has been standardized here as both images were produced for the explicit purpose of identification. They were designed to be compared so at least in this case we can all decide for ourselves, no gatekeeping necessary (perhaps unfortunately for Professor Abbott).

    Like

    July 29, 2023
  17. John Sanders #

    Jessa #

    I for one I am somewhat confused re the argument on heights which to all intents is an irrelevance; bearing in mind that the lads from the photo stand equal based on Roy’s known height of 5′ 8″ As for the Beach body, once again we must also accept a given deceased height upon discovery of 5′ 11″ until proven wrong one way or another. There we can end the debate by banging another nail in bluey Somerton’s shiny new coffin, or should that be casket?

    Like

    July 29, 2023
  18. The Sly Dog #

    After so much time there is going to things collected, written or taken by the investigating police that we will never know about. I doubt GF even had a chance of seeing if hearing about it all.
    For example #13 no photo of the code page.. that marked up code page looks to be a photo that was taken of the unmarked code page, then marked up with an inky texta or similar. So there was actually a photo of the unmarked code page at an early stage of the game…

    Like

    July 29, 2023

Leave a comment