January 1, 2026 1:33 pm
To begin.
1 We (being Cramer) know after years of heavy research all the answers to this infernal mystery are now apparent.
2 We (being Cramer) know the fob pocket where the TS slip was found was a ‘secret’ fob pocket.
3 We (being Cramer) know that Feltus was wrong on this matter
4 We (being Cramer) know they (Alf and Jessica) were able to read the meaning of the code.
5 We (being Cramer) know Bob Wake (ASIO) was suspicious of Gordon Strapps and Olive Neill and had them on a watching brief. If Wake was suspicious of every member of the Eureka Youth League he would have been a very busy man, there were thousands of them in the country.
UPDATE
6 We (being Cramer) know who the Somerton Man was. But the shape of his nose you say, it’s saddle shaped, not at all like our man. But no fear, Cramer has an answer to that, the apparent saddle-nose is the result of this chap wearing a tight-fitting oxygen mask on a recent flight.
7 We (ditto) know of the relationship between SM and Tibor Kalder. Shared time in the morgue can be a meaningful experience, yes?
8 We (ditto) know the Boxall Rubaiyat was a (code) training manual, or something.
9 We (ditto) know that the contents of the suitcase was ‘litter’.
UPDATE
10 But what about the spool of Barbour Thread found in the suitcase, the thread that matched the repairs on the shirt and jacket SM was wearing when found?
No real problem there says Cramer. He asked us to ‘consider’ how long it might take to make those repairs, 15 minutes max. Of course when somebody was silly enough to ask him how that might have been managed with the suitcase at the station and the body miles away, the question wasn’t posted, blocked in fact.
11 We (ditto) know what the secret ID code was that connected Kaldor and SM.
12 We (ditto) know the SM’s corpse was switched for another.
13 We (ditto) know that SM’s face was ‘reconstructed’.
UPDATE
14 We (ditto) also know that what was once described by DS Leane as a ‘faintly pencilled code ‘ could be manipulated into something completely different, like a clearly visible inked up series of letters. This in particular is Cramer at his best.
15 We (ditto) know how many types of coding were used in both the code and Verse 70 in the respective Rubaiyats.
Micro-code, Morbit Cipher, Hills Cipher and the anamorphic method.
—
I may be missing a few so feel free to add more –
Posted by peterbowes
Categories: Uncategorized
Tags:
Mobile Site | Full Site
Get a free blog at WordPress.com Theme: WordPress Mobile Edition by Alex King.
We know for sure that the verse 70 endorsement of Boxall’s Rubaiyat was the work of Major William Jestyn Moulds OBE. Clive knows.
LikeLiked by 1 person
By dusty on January 1, 2026 at 8:08 pm
Did I forget that ?
LikeLike
By peterbowes on January 1, 2026 at 8:59 pm
Well, GC’s right about SM not being there overnight. If he was he would have been washed out to sea
Born and bred in Adelaide I know that stretch of beach at Somerton has no beach at high tide. There is no sand. The tide is right up to the sea wall.
SM was definitely dumped there on the morning of 1 December 1948. The Advertiser weather map page 10 shows high tide at 4:34am and sunrise 4:56am and first light is about half hour before that in Adelaide, about 4:30am. Slight seas and moderate north-east to north-west wind.
SM couldn’t possibly have been there overnight. The window of opportunity to dump him on the beach in low light and with ebbing tide is ideal between 4:30am and 5:00am
That’s what happened. It’s not speculation, the tide time and first light time prove it.
With that exact location being used, I wouldn’t rule out SM being carted from across the road, and a certain person keeping a lookout to make sure the coast was clear (literally)
LikeLike
By No. 1 on January 2, 2026 at 9:25 am
So, it would appear that between 04.30-05.00, that was the ‘best’ time span for the appearance of the SM. (I’m trying to remember the time when the horse trainers first noticed the body, was it about 06.00?). Two other questions come to mind: 1. Why, if the SM fell foul of certain individuals, wasn’t he placed on the beach so that the high tide would wash him out to sea? Thus, no comeback if his body was never seen again.
You could, perhaps, think there was a reason why he wasn’t on that particular location until after the high tide had receded. In other words, he was meant to be found, others involved were only too well aware of the tide timetable?
2. Perhaps John Lyons did see a man waving his arm (drunk?) But, not the SM. later, this man got up and staggered home?
LikeLike
By Clive on January 5, 2026 at 2:53 pm
The News which was the Adelaide afternoon newspaper, gives the same forecast on page 10, 30 Nov 1948 mild day, north-west winds, slight seas. (Same as the Advertiser)
Adelaide can have mild days in November. The front page of the Advertiser 1 December 1948 gives the previous day’s temperatures as min 52.1 F, max 76.3 F (which is only 24.6 C) and likely around 3pm
Front page of the Advertiser 2 December 1948 gives the previous day’s minimum temperature as 65.7 F (which is only 18.7 C) and that would be just before dawn. It’s fairly cool for most people to want to take a walk at first light, so nobody was around.
I’m convinced SM wasn’t on the beach overnight, and that he was dumped there after first light
I’m also convinced that SM wasn’t Carl Webb an unrequited lover who went to see Jess, was rejected, went to the beach that evening and topped himself.
SM was not on that beach overnight because the tide was right up. He was dumped there between first light and dawn as the tide ebbed.
That’s where we stand
LikeLike
By No. 1 on January 2, 2026 at 12:28 pm
Wondering if the SM worked at the CCH? Then, I suppose why place his body on the beach opposite to the CCH, why draw attention to the CCH, if the CCH was not involved. But, I can’t remember reading any news on whether or not staff, at the CCH, were interviewed by the police. Perhaps the CCH was, in some form or other, involved and Adelaide being Adelaide, a swift coverup was all it took.
LikeLike
By Clive on January 2, 2026 at 1:22 pm
Time and Tide Waits For No Man mugger. In the SM case, they were done to death way before Chris Cramer’s first of several tiresome repeat ventures into the fray with his opinions born of those who’d made similar a decade ago and then some. You’ll likely find some of them right here on Tbt, if they’ve survived and many on CM’s ‘The last 24 hours’ thread too. Suggest you check and see what Peteb, Byron and others were discussing way back in 2013.
LikeLike
By dusty on January 2, 2026 at 1:33 pm
How sure can we be about the high tide reaching the wall overnight? Sandy beaches have always been unreliable in that respect, particularly given the effects of strong onshore and offshore winds and heavy rainfall in the near and far distances. A photo would help.
LikeLike
By peterbowes on January 2, 2026 at 1:46 pm
The Advertiser 30 November 1948 gives the evening high tide at 4:52pm. That tide would also be right up to the seawall and there would be no beach
That means there was never a body on the beach on the evening of 30 November 1948. It also means that those who claimed they were walking on the beach, weren’t
LikeLike
By No. 1 on January 2, 2026 at 1:54 pm
Sit in your car there on the Esplanade when you come to Adelaide and see how far up the tide comes at high tide. I already know that.
Wouldn’t want a beachfront property along there, you ain’t got no beach
LikeLike
By No. 1 on January 2, 2026 at 2:05 pm
Come on fellas, yous are not listening to what I’ve just told y’all about Cramer’s repeat performance of ancient discussions on tidal (King tide) variations, weather influence etc. at Somerton on the night in question. Seems you’re happy to follow his folly. and y’can bet your sweet bippies others ie. Dingo Pelling, Steve H are, having a right royal hoot at our expence.
LikeLike
By dusty on January 2, 2026 at 3:25 pm
Remind me old mate … what’s your position on this? And I don’t mean lying around on the beach wearing pink sluggos.
LikeLike
By peterbowes on January 2, 2026 at 3:59 pm
Well, I don’t agree with all of his assumptions about it, wind direction, storm, etc, but I can see from local knowledge that it is true and it’s just normal tides at Somerton not king tides
I lived south of Somerton at South Brighton for 23 years and that stretch of beach arguably the best bit in Adelaide between the Jetty at Brighton and Seacliff has no rock seawall and is a wide stretch of beach whereas the beach north at Somerton has the rock seawall and if that wasn’t there, the Esplanade would have probably been eroded into the sea by now and the homes along there under serious threat.
Just FYI I moved up the top of the hill south of the city 17 years ago and have views right up the coast and over the suburbs and the city.
Just saying, that’s how I see Somerton from local knowledge. If that rock wall wasn’t in place on that section of beach then there would be serious erosion because the tide is right up. That’s why the rock seawall is there and it’s not needed further south where the beach is wider.
Normal tide at Somerton seems to be around 2 metres and on 1 December 1948 the high tide is given at almost 3 metres, it would have been up high on the sea wall, not crashing as in a storm, just a high tide which would have covered all the sand in front of the wall. SM could not have possibly been there overnight and as he was there in the morning he was dumped there just before he was found.
LikeLike
By No. 1 on January 2, 2026 at 4:24 pm
All of what you’re telling us now, No. 1 has been said before, long ago and far away so why repeat it. Hope it’s not for ego stroking, as be the case with your friend Mr. C, Gordon Cramer. You being a Somerton Beach Nth Brighton denison and all so you say, we can respect your greater knowledge re the coastal layout in more recent times; however, things naturally changed following the many storms since 1948 and that must be put into perspective. Please do as I suggested and go back to early posts, you may learn a thing or two from the likes of those like Deveson and Co. who done their homework.
LikeLike
By dusty on January 2, 2026 at 7:44 pm
Dusty, given that the comments you remember so clearly, and given there has been thousands of them, all of which you clearly recollect, please direct us to them, ok? We are, after all just wallowing in the tides of disparate opinions ..
LikeLike
By peterbowes on January 2, 2026 at 9:14 pm
If you want a dekko at what the beaches look like try Real Estate dot com dot au:
Sold listing on 15 May 2024 for 9/218 Esplanade Seacliff shows the beach at South Brighton and Seacliff with revegetation and sand dunes and wide beach, north and south views, from Brighton Jetty and down past the Seacliff pub right down the end of the beach
Sold listing on 11 August 2021 for 24A Esplanade Somerton Park shows the beach at Somerton Park with all the rocks piled up to make the seawall and the sea right up with no beach
At high tide you ain’t got a beach there at Somerton Park and not much beach at other times either
Enjoy
LikeLike
By No. 1 on January 2, 2026 at 8:04 pm
Couple of things Cramer forgot, or else didn’t wish to mention in his AI assusted dissertation come to mind. They being the two small mounds of seaborn debris close by the tidal wall, subject of which came up at one point; and of course the locked gate atop the stairway that may have created difficulties if a body was to be carried down by such means as the author suggests.
LikeLike
By dusty on January 2, 2026 at 9:54 pm
It’s a public beach with right of access, not private property
No locked gates anywhere, in fact no gates anywhere, full stop
Never was, never will be
I’m a local, I know
LikeLike
By No. 1 on January 3, 2026 at 8:35 am
Fact: Somerton beach is the narrowest section of beach and at high tide the water is right up to the seawall and the sand is covered
Here’s some videos of high tide at Somerton beach:
https://www.facebook.com/groups/1885987812164667/posts/1973152233448224/
Thanks for watching
LikeLike
By No. 1 on January 3, 2026 at 9:42 am
Somerton beach at high tide
https://www.facebook.com/722995007/videos/pcb.1973152233448224/1522451165872602
Thanks again for watching
LikeLike
By No. 1 on January 3, 2026 at 9:49 am
Nice work oncer.. point proven.
LikeLike
By peterbowes on January 3, 2026 at 10:06 am
Some might suggest wallowing in the tidal ebb & flow; no doubt due to the constantky rising sea levels over many decades and of course climate change, if you’re a believer. C. Gordon Cramer does not hold such views generally, but it don’t mean his latest borrowed theory is all shite, no not at all and I haven’t suggested anything of the sort. After all much of it belongs to guess who?
LikeLike
By dusty on January 3, 2026 at 10:55 am
And, as bloody usual, this high tide scenario raises another couple of questions. Here we have PC Moss, a man who knows this beach well, and he’s listening to Lyons who’s telling him he saw what looked like the same fellow in the same place on the previous evening – so why wouldn’t Moss question how come the body hadn’t been swamped by the previous night’s high tide.
Come to think of it, why wasn’t the same question asked by the senior detectives working the case?
LikeLike
By peterbowes on January 3, 2026 at 11:15 am
Three mounds of debris, not two, in the panorama shot of the beach scene at X marks the spot, seems to indicate they may have built up over some time so didn’t form their dump fullness during one tidal run in period to full height of 9′ at 4.34am. We discussed this at length in the past and none of us experts were able to explain why it should be thus, assuming the scene was photographed on 1 December.
LikeLike
By dusty on January 3, 2026 at 11:59 am
Then of course there’s always those potential body drag marks that can only be seen with 20/20 vision. What may be seen as heel mark indentations lead from the roadside fence north of Alvington CCH down a sandy bank towards the nearest debris mound. This could well have served as a nice cushion for the subsequent body drop (dead or alive) from the stormwall top to beach level. Saves having to use Cramer’s creative staircase mock-up which is of little use when a real life photo of the stairs be as plain as day, taken on the day.
LikeLike
By dusty on January 3, 2026 at 2:32 pm
Perhaps PC Moss, being a lowly pc, didn’t want to contradict a well known business man, especially, if John Lyons came across as an ‘I know better than you’ attitude? Senior detectives didn’t ask the question because they already knew the the SM wasn’t on the beach the previous night. And, if PC Moss had raised the issue with senior detectives, he would have received the same admonishment as finding the box of matches.
LikeLike
By Clive on January 3, 2026 at 2:32 pm
He didn’t mind contradicting Leane about the matches that weren’t there then suddenly were.
LikeLike
By peterbowes on January 3, 2026 at 2:41 pm
That’s true, perhaps PC Moss sensed something wasn’t quite kosher about the story from John Lyons. Let the senior detectives follow through was his possible thinking?
LikeLike
By Clive on January 3, 2026 at 8:52 pm
…and for his bloody hide and disobedience, our first offender, PC John Moss found himself a long way from his cosy Nth. Brighton retreat, ending up spending the remaineder of his police service at Henley Beach, a shit hole according to thems that served there. Couple of good stories about his later on duty commendments should anybody be interested (clue = ducklings and floating ice boxes).
LikeLike
By dusty on January 3, 2026 at 3:34 pm
OK, looks as if Gordon Cramer and Co. win that round without having to get a knockout blow in, or prove anything more than evidence already on the board. Plenty of proof re ‘Surfs up’ at Somerton Beach to settle the score, in black and white from early times that were plainly ignored, not by Byron Devious they were’nt, nor producers of Inside Story. Still there for the asking on NAA @ Somerton Beach, how strange.
LikeLike
By dusty on January 3, 2026 at 4:04 pm
Some folks might find Deveson’s post of 20/11/13 quite
LikeLike
By dusty on January 3, 2026 at 4:56 pm
More info … what thread?
LikeLike
By peterbowes on January 3, 2026 at 5:00 pm
…educational, in fact says it all; another on the same “last 24 hours” CM thread, in fact the very last tells you how Cramer really felt about the prevailing conditions on Somerton Beach circa.1948
LikeLike
By dusty on January 3, 2026 at 5:03 pm
They didn’t know Now you do
LikeLike
By No. 1 on January 3, 2026 at 5:23 pm
“Research”. That one word gives the game away and I say that with some authority, especially when it comes to my dealings with likes of Mr. Research and his minions. I might not be in the same all knowing league as his research experts, but I sure as heck learn a lot of bad habits from them.
LikeLike
By dusty on January 3, 2026 at 7:44 pm
What’s the key to you Bozo? You hard of hearing or something? Dealing with the enemy is a capital offence wbere I’m presently domiciled.
LikeLike
By dusty on January 3, 2026 at 5:40 pm
The list I’ve put up above is mostly of Cramer’s Crazy Claims .. Am I being to subtle? The old lad is a giant-sized target and doesn’t know it.
LikeLike
By peterbowes on January 3, 2026 at 5:47 pm
Just for the record Mr JS, I’m not in GC’s pocket, or anyone else’s for that matter. I just do some research and write it as I see it. Boomer who was born and bred in Adelaide and with some local knowledge that I hope can help others
Rgds
LikeLike
By No. 1 on January 3, 2026 at 6:08 pm
Helps me .
LikeLike
By peterbowes on January 3, 2026 at 6:12 pm
I’ve walked a few times along that part of Somerton Beach and, there is hardly any beach at that location, just large boulders, rocks etc. I guess you just stand in front of the boulders, nearly opposite the site of the CCH, and try and imagine what it looked like in 1948. Pity the council have repaved everywhere, cut trees down, benches taken away etc.
LikeLike
By Clive on January 3, 2026 at 9:01 pm
Environmental mistakes were made and development went ahead on the sandhills
You get a glimpse of what it once looked like when you walk along the beach behind Minda Home (between Gladstone Road and Repton Road Somerton Park – see it on Google Earth). The sand dunes are still there. Notice how there is no rock seawall along that stretch of beach because the sand dunes are still there. You can scoot along there on Street View. Walking along that stretch of beach when I was young you felt very isolated and lonely. There was always more sand on the beach there and there still is, you can see that on Google Earth. In the late 60’s on that beach, up the Repton Rd end and near the Surf Club, you’d have rock music festivals on a stage that was erected on the beach, that were free and attracted a huge crowd. I saw Jim Keays The Masters Apprentices play there, must have been 1968.
Great times
LikeLike
By No. 1 on January 4, 2026 at 9:46 am
Crazy claims
GC doesn’t know jack about Adelaide:
“I visited the area in 2023 and found that there was only one location where dug-outs could have been built and that was around 20 yards North of the then Kiosk near the Broadway. The geography fitted the concept”
https://www.holdfast.sa.gov.au/assets/general-downloads/Discover/Historic-Walk-Glenelg-Mansions-DL.pdf
LikeLike
By No. 1 on January 4, 2026 at 1:28 pm
Those grand old buildings, together with their owners give you an appreciation of the earlier days of wealth and political power in Adelaide. Sydney on the other hand was a lot of allyways, two-up schools and badly built tenements.
LikeLike
By peterbowes on January 4, 2026 at 2:29 pm
So it says on the second page of the brochure:
By the mid-1880s, the sand dunes of Glenelg’s
esplanade had long given way to the summer
residences of the prominent and wealthy of South
Australia. Previously known as Albert Parade,
and then Seawall, South Esplanade was once a
promenade of magnificent Victorian mansions
and summer gardens.
https://www.holdfast.sa.gov.au/assets/general-downloads/Discover/Historic-Walk-Glenelg-Mansions-DL.pdf
No sand dunes there in 1948
No poor people living in dug-outs there in 1948
Where on earth does GC get this nonsense from that he writes Can you give any credibility to any of it
LikeLike
By No. 1 on January 4, 2026 at 7:23 pm
Cramer doesn’t realise that joining the Comunist Party back in the day wasn’t necessarily an indication that the individual wanted to spy on his country .. more so he or she wanted a fair share of political influence and the chance to share the State’s chances of doing better. Not everybody got a room in those mansions..
LikeLike
By peterbowes on January 4, 2026 at 7:35 pm
“About the Investigator” C. Gordon Cramer 3 Jan. 2926 BS/TS in response to a reader’s dumb comment, taken from a chapter of his never to be released lost saga of “The Somerton Man That Never Was’ or more appropriately ‘Bore & Sleaze’…if yous please or don’t please.
LikeLike
By dusty on January 5, 2026 at 11:55 am
I guess Cramer be talking shite (he posted ..ite) in his latest special offering of audio on BS/TS for his faithful few. Couldn’t be anything else could it?
LikeLike
By dusty on January 8, 2026 at 3:40 pm
Want a hoot, get yer selves over to Big Tootie and see who’s in town; Yeah none other than our Man from Uncle, Flash Gordon in his element; giving the locals a run down on how the TS code letters give a clear reprentation of SA railway stations which he goes on to list alphabetically for maximum effect.
LikeLike
By dusty on January 8, 2026 at 11:31 pm
What’s the thread name?
LikeLike
By peterbowes on January 9, 2026 at 8:54 am
Page 52, they don’t have threads on Big Toorie, and Gordon posts as both Gordon and Zedx, starts December 13
LikeLike
By dusty on January 9, 2026 at 10:32 am
I’m looking at big footie and there’s a million pages on a million subjects and I’m not dick Tracy.
LikeLike
By peterbowes on January 9, 2026 at 11:44 am
You’re darn toot’n y’not. Anyhow, redacted (peter Davidson) & co. have only managed 52 pages since 2012, so a damn ‘site’ easier to find something there than trickie Nickies CM maze. Easier still be that Gordon’s train station crap is on the very last page 52!
LikeLike
By dusty on January 9, 2026 at 1:59 pm