Skip to content

Detective Canney’s interview with Jessica Harkness

Here’s a detective sent to an address to interview a woman linked to an unidentified man found dead  in mysterious circumstances close by her home.

Police work. A possible murder. This is what a detective was trained for, to investigate. So what happened to his notes? Or was Canney a specially gifted policeman in the possession of a retentive memory? Even so, when he took the results of his interview back to the station somebody surely would have established a record of what was asked and what was said. (John Sanders?) A ‘Record of Interview’.

Did Canney show her a photo of the dead man? Did he describe the dead man in any detail? Did he ask if she knew him or had seen him lately? And the ROK with her phone number written on the back, did Canney have it with him to show her?

But no, all we have is the story of  her boozy relationship with Boxall. Or am I missing something?

11 Comments Post a comment
  1. john sanders #

    In my view It was an informal vist to arrange for the bust ID? at the museum nothing more, this under strict instruction from the top. I have my reasons which don’t conflict with the Feltus book Canney involvement.

    Like

    February 24, 2025
    • Fair enough .. though if Canny had a copy of the photo of SM he would have been able to eliminate Boxall straight away. As it was they asked the Sydney police to not only interview Boxall at his work but accompany him back to his home and have to fight their way through a crowd of reporters camped on the street.
      There’s the time gap between the two interviews. Harkness first, then the leak to the newspapers, then Boxall is confronted.

      Like

      February 24, 2025
  2. No. 1 #

    “We’ll take it from here” when he got back

    Like

    February 24, 2025
    • john sanders #

      I served with Canney’s son Peter Laurence Canney, bn. 46 in the late sixties overseas. Looks like he’s still known well in sporting circles and shouldn’t be difficult to track down, view to getting the low down on the SM case…Ref. Narrabunda circa 1963.

      Like

      February 28, 2025
  3. Clive #

    Perhaps Canney did record his questions and Jessie’s replies in his notebook. But, someone in the pecking order decided, Canney’s notes would possibly ‘open a can of worms’, a can better left unopened. So, in time, his notes conveniently, like the ROK, disappeared.

    Like

    February 24, 2025
  4. john sanders #

    Promise not to blab about it Clive, especially to our erstwhile colleagues, Syph Horworst and the Dud who would be livid with envy and pan it as blatant lies. I got to know Errol Canney when he was the Senior Lecturer and Superintendent of Aust. Police College Manly in the early seventies when I studied there. Nice chap, liked a beer with the troops and didn’t mind relating to his halycon days as a ‘D’ in Adelaide and later when partnered with likes of the immortal Verbal Kelly whilst seconded to Sydney CIB Homicide..I think it was Jess what called Len Brown on the Sunday with her RNSW AB story after hearing about ‘Freeman’s reach’ and giving them her res. details which was acted upon by Angus St. next day. Scan Sutherland gave it to the press hounds and that’s how details got mixed up re when, where and how.

    Like

    February 24, 2025
  5. Clive #

    It would have been interesting, I suppose, to know if the SA police logged all outgoing calls from X3239. Especially, any interstate calls to NSW, Vic etc.

    Like

    February 24, 2025
  6. john sanders #

    Anyone interested in Canney, you’ll find him at NAA under passenger arrivals (3 entries) for Errol Sydney Canney bn.1919. There’s quite a bit on him way back in Adelaide of the forties on Trove entries, including involvement with Tibor Kaldor, Keith Mangnoson, investigating a murder in Broken Hill, plus ligit freelancing as a debt collector while still in Sapol.

    Like

    February 25, 2025
  7. Anonymous #

    I’m coming back around to Thomson’s car malarkery being at the centre of this….
    25 Sept 1948 Thomson has a brand new car to swap for something suitable for a taxi (he’s taxied before and we see him Taxi later)
    6 November, 12 November, 13 November he’s advertising his chauffeur service again (after nothing through October) – reasonable to assume he managed to get his taxi?
    13 November, 27 Novemebr he’s also looking for a new house (anywhere, but will swap for Moseley St) – his taxi service seems to have paused
    18 December – the Tudor Watch
    1st Jan still wants out of Glenelg
    5th Jan we’re back on the Taxis

    (The coincidentally named Thompson who had identified SM as Walsh withdraws her identification in early Jan 1949)

    I know NP went some similar directions with Pruzinski…..and maybe there’s still a connection
    So consider (deliberately trying to add lots of angles that people can take tangents from):
    – Thomson somehow acquires a brand new Vauxhall in September 1948
    – Sometime between then and November he swaps his new car for a taxi
    – A week later he’s worried and looking to sell up and move
    – all the speculation about the Tudor watch (add in the other watches if you like)
    – New Year and he’s still worried about something (or he prepaid the ad) – if SM is who he’s scared of, he doesn’t yet realise that SM is the body on the beach (or perhaps he’s scared of the same people who got SM?)
    – Early Jan something has triggered him to think the threat has passed (and Leane is appointed to the case a couple days later – not that that’s related)

    And then later
    – Jun 11 (49) Prosper is advertising houses again
    – Jun 15 Prosper is advertising country trips
    – Jun 18 Prosper is looking for a gun

    • Did Prosper acquire the Vauxhaul legitimately, or did he pinch it from the wrong people?
    • Was there something in the Vauxhaul that was accidentally left in the car that someone came looking for?
    • What sort of car did Freeman have (I’m sure it’s been discussed, and I don’t think it was a vauxhaul)
    • What happened in early Jan that Thomson no longer saw the need for a bungalow?
    • Was there maybe a threat of a split with Harkness that had eased?
    • All sorts of NP tangents – a lot of his driving seems to go to Broken Hill or Port Lincoln (or was it Port Pirie?) – is there a Pruzinski connection.
    • If Prosper’s anxiety is due to some threat surrounding SM, and it eases in Jan, why does Jess still have a weird reaction to the body in August (?) – is it perhaps not who they’d expected?
    • How does the ad for a Gun fit in shortly after he starts searching for a house again – did something make them worry the threat hadn’t past?
    • Does the renewed worry tie in with an article about the Tamam Shud slip on Jun 9th?

    Like

    February 25, 2025
  8. No. 1 #

    You can inherit money and borrow it

    You can buy and sell houses and cars to increase your wealth

    Determined go-getter

    Nothing links him to SM

    Like

    February 25, 2025
  9. No. 1 #

    Microcode

    Someone tell him (again)

    Like

    February 25, 2025

Leave a comment