Skip to content

Inside DS Leane’s office on the 23rd of July 1949.

Copy of torn page printed in media

To begin …

Detective Sergeant Leane has a visitor this Saturday morning so the regular golf game is out. His is a surprise visitor: the chemist Freeman has found what might be a crucial piece of evidence in the Somerton Man case, one that has kept Adelaide at a high pitch of interest since the case inquest was adjourned the previous month. Freeman is waiting in the lobby of the CIB office now and is impatient to tell the Detective Sergeant all about it.

It happens that …

both men are seated in Leane’s office and Freeman watches as Leane carefully examines the Rubaiyat, because as Freeman had already explained, the book had only been handled twice since being found in the back footwell of his car by his brother-in-law who was travelling with his wife and Freeman on a jaunt on one day close to the time the Somerton Man was found dead not too far distant from his pharmacy.

Then ..

Leane finished with his note-taking and after agreeing to leave the pharmacist’s name confidential Freeman exits the building and tootles back to his Glenelg dispensary, pleased to have been able to assist the local constabulary with their enquiries.

Leane considers getting his fingerprint man in before deciding to leave the job until Monday, the book has a lot of pages and the accountants are being difficult with the station’s overtime expense tally. He leaves his office for the evidence room and retrieves the Tamam Shud slip found in the Somerton Man’s fob pocket four months previously.

Leane returns to his office, carefully opens the book then places the Tamam Shud slip inside the torn out section on the last page. Now he is sure.

Leane telephones The Sun and suggests they send a reporter and photographer to his office, soonest.

The newspapermen arrive and after convincing the desk corporal they were invited, proceed to Leane’s office where, after the introductions, they are invited to observe the two items on his desk. A book and a very small piece of paper. Proudly, Leane demonstrates how well they fit and suggests that while he holds the book open with his thumb, carefully, they get their one picture. And after asking the Detective Sergeant most respectfully if they could take a photograph of the slip in its rightful position, the newsmen are surprised when Leane slips the slip into his desk drawer and closes it, firmly.

‘click’

The newsmen then exit the CIB office and hurry back to their paper, anxious to get their sensational news in before the first edition deadline.

‘No problems about the pic,’ said the editor after he’d listened to their story, crestfallen as they were at having missed the first print run, ‘I just happened to have one handy myself.’

‘click’

Note: some say the slip had been trimmed, well, he had the scissors for that but it doesn’t explain why he ripped it out of the book. But none of the above ever happened, did it?

4 Comments Post a comment
  1. Clive #

    Possibly the ripped piece of paper had more than the “Tamam Shud” writing, but a signature underneath?

    May 25, 2021
  2. MyName #

    The news didn’t get to Broken Hill. on 1 August they published an article suggesting police were still looking for the Rubaiyat.
    https://trove.nla.gov.au/newspaper/article/48611254/3462505

    NB: The reporting in the papers is inconsistent. Articles published 24/07 and 25/07 all suggest book was handed in “yesterday” or “last night” – but point is that dates can be a bit misleading.

    I assume the “On the evening of 22nd…..the following morning” comes from Feltus. Nothing against him or his book at all, but you have to understand that’s likely a modern-day literary interpretation of multiple pieces of evidence. We know there was an article on the 22/7 appealing to the public. We also know the from 23/7 articles were published suggesting a possible breakthrough. But how much of “evening” and “next morning” is known, and how much of that is artistic license – that is, putting the story together based on the known, but in so doing implying a particular sequence that might not be accurate.
    “Evening” makes sense, because we know Freeman worked, and we might know which edition of the paper had the appeal – so “Evening” is a reasonable assumption, but there’s nothing to say that he hadn’t read it at breakfast, or at lunch, or at some other time during a slow day. I haven’t managed to find articles, but I thought I recalled seeing something like “last night a man came forward”. This to me suggests one of 2 things – the “next morning” was purely artistic speculation in creating a story and it was handed in the night before. OR Freeman rang the CIB on 22/7 and said “Heya, I think I might have the book you’re looking for”. In the latter scenario, Leane might have then said “would you have time to bring that in tomorrow morning before work for us to have a bit of a squizz?”. In this case, firstly everything can be done and dusted early in the day, or secondly Leane could’ve gotten straight on the blower to his mate at the ‘tizer saying “Hey mate, we might have a breakthrough here….wanna swing past my office around 10AM tomorrow”. Alternatively, Leane with media rep in tow went to meet Freeman at his place – in this case they bring a camera to take a pic of Freeman, but Freeman is reluctant to be pictured so they take a snap of the book instead. Or some variation of all of that.
    I think in either case making an afternoon deadline would be quite simples.

    The lack of finger in the newspaper one is noteworthy – but I think the one with the finger has always been presented as a more recent “re-creation” – could be wrong.

    May 27, 2021
  3. The point being, Myname, is that there is no evidence the Freeman book existed. None.

    May 27, 2021

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: