Skip to content

Rocketry

Beginning in September 1944, over 3,000 V-2s were launched by the German Wehrmacht against Allied targets.

~~

‘During the existence of the Soviet Union its most unambiguous interaction with foreign rocketry occurred in 1945 / 1946 when Soviet government teams collected vast stores of German matériel for eventual return to the USSR. As a result of this engagement, in 1946 the Soviet state initiated development of long range missiles …’

Asif A, Siddiqi. jstore.org

~~

In 1946, the UK and Australia established the Anglo-Australian Joint Project to test rockets, atomic bombs and other weaponry. Australia had the large areas of virtually uninhabited land needed to test such devices, and in return was given access to the technology the project developed.

The initial impetus for the program came from the UK’s desire to develop a long-range rocket similar to Germany’s V2, the world’s first ballistic missile.’

‘British defence planners knew that their small island would not survive a future atomic blitz and, therefore, needed `active’ deterrent weapons. The problem was that the US after 1946 moved to protect its atomic monopoly and denied Britain research, raw materials, and test facilities. Australia was, therefore, an invaluable partner in the British deterrent weapons programme, in all its aspects from research to testing, as long as the US refused co-operation. The quest for atomic weapons lies at the heart of many of Canberra’s initiatives after 1945.’ 

~~

‘With the fall of Germany in 1945, many unused V-2 rockets and components were captured by the Allies. Many German rocket scientists came to the United States. Others went to the Soviet Union. The German scientists included Wernher von Braun.

~~

What this all means in plain English is that although Germany had the most powerful weapon in Europe it lost the war. So, unsurprisingly, the Russians wanted one in their arsenal as well, as did the Americans and the British.

You could imagine the diplomatic complications of having all these (Allied?) nations plundering German V2 manufacturing and testing records at the same time. Particularly as Russia wasn’t speaking about their missile development with either America or Britain and America wasn’t speaking about their missile development with either Russia, Britain or Australia.

~~

‘To support the Anglo-Australian Joint Project, the Australian Government in 1947 initiated the Long Range Weapons Establishment (LRWE) in an old munitions factory at Salisbury in just north of Adelaide.’

~~

Given the above, would it be reasonable to assume that in 1948 both Russia and America would have been interested in how we were going down there in Salisbury?

Would it also be reasonable to suspect that the Americans may have dealt harshly with a Russian found seeking the same information they were?

Or vice-versa.

reference: ACS Heritage Project : chapter 7 store.org

3 Comments Post a comment
  1. Clive #

    Perhaps the SM was a ‘double agent”, playing one side off against the other side? He did it once too many times and paid the price? Could 90a Moseley St have been a ‘dead letter’ drop?

    May 17, 2021
    • I’m thinking that if any info had been passed from SM to someone else, or from them to him if a handover had been successful, it would be another task to see it got to the right man who could then pass it on to his (Russian?) masters. Glenelg had its listening posts so it would be unlikely to be sent by radio transmission, even if coded. That too would raise suspicion. That being so, I like those Rubaiyat-sized envelopes he had in his case, which makes old SM look like a repeat offender.

      May 17, 2021
  2. Dennis #

    127 german Nazi scientist and engineers were secretly brought to Australia between 1946 and 1950 given new lives and their past history deleted i find the idea that he was a nazi scientist more plausible than a Russian spy as real world spy’s usually operate in plain sight under false identities maybe SM was one of these scientists maybe he wasn’t playing ball with his handlers and had to be removed..

    May 19, 2021

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: