the unexplained, inexplicable and the redacted.
(1) ‘Surprising but explainable.’
(2) The cigarette that didn’t burn.
(3) The witness’s statement.
(4) Mr Francis.
(5) The Source Code.
(6) Professor Cleland’s lapses.
(7) The analyst who couldn’t.
(8) Numbers never photographed.
(9) The Rubaiyat never photographed.
(10) A statement not required.
(11) A statement not required.
(12) A lack of correspondence.
(13) An absence of socks.
(14) The question Boxall wasn’t asked.
(1) Professor Cleland, professor of Physiology and Pharmacy at University of Adelaide:
“The lividity around the ears and neck was perhaps surprising in view of his position, but it was explainable.”
The explanation was never forthcoming.
(2) A cigarette, half-smoked, had fallen from the deceased’s mouth onto his right collar.
There were no scorch marks found on his cheek or his clothing. His matches were in his pocket.
(3) The credible witness who observed a well-dressed man carrying a man along the Somerton shore the evening before the body was found gave his statement to the police ten years later.
This statement was never acted upon.
(4) The identity of Mr Francis remains redacted.
Given this, the details regarding his finding and handing in of the Rubaiyat to DS Leane carry doubt.
(5) The source code on the back of the Rubaiyat was obliterated.
(6) Professor Cleland took three months to report his finding of the Tamam Shud slip in the fob pocket of the deceased’s trousers.
Professor Cleland failed to remember the whereabouts of a fob pocket on a pair of commonly made Crusader Cloth trousers.
(7) RJ Cowan was unable to identify the black powder shaken from the brush found in the deceased’s suitcase.
Cowan was the Senior Government Analyst at the time.
(8) A photograph of the phone number found on the back of the Rubaiyat has never been made public. A photograph of the other number found on the back of the same book has never been made public.
(9) The Rubaiyat was never photographed: front, back or interior.
(10) The nurse, a person of interest, was never formally interviewed.
(11) The person of interest’s live-in companion was never formally interviewed.
(12) The deceased’s suitcase contained unused letterforms, pencils and empty envelopes. No correspondence was found in the suitcase.
(13) There were spare singlets and shirts and underpants found in the deceased’s suitcase, but no socks.
(14) “Do you know a man named Keane, initial T ?