Skip to content


Milongal is the pseudonym for a fellow who has been up to his neck in the Somerton Case as long as anyone else around here, he’s a regular on CM but the committee here doesn’t think NP gives him a decent run for his money.

We hope to change that.

There’s nothing more invigorating than hearing another take on the mystery and milongal  gets a turn on centre stage here, just like Dude47 and BD, Gordon Cramer etc – even the cumudgeon himself, The Dome.

The best way forward, we think, is to pick the pertinent eyes out of M’s last post on CM and reproduce them here, nothing sinister intended, if anything is out of order we will change it. Ok?

From the top:

“(1) I think the onus to prove the microwriting is on the proponents who believe in it (and I can see Clive and Gordon have invested significant research into it [and kudos to them for it] – but I remain unconvinced).
(2) I don’t think SM is Pavel. I don’t think Tibor is related much. I absolutely don’t think there’s microcode on the “code” page. I don’t really thing there’s microcode on Jestyn’s scribbles to Alf. I seriously doubt any microcode on Feltus’ book.

(3) I’m not sure SM was at the Adelaide Railway Station that day.

(4) I’m not certain it’s his suitcase.

(5) I don’t believe either ticket in his pocket was his.

(6) I struggle with the spy theory because there are too many obviously extraordinary things.

(7) I think the burden of proof for microwriting is on the people who believes it exists. And the “proof” to date is (in my opinion) not there.

(8) I find it odd that we argue over microcode when (as far as I can tell) it isn’t actually related to the likelihood of Pavel being, or not being SM

…so we’re essentially arguing over an irrelevant detail.

(9) I don’t subscribe to Pavel for loads of other reasons (even other than the weak resemblance)”

That’s it, milongal: your line is set, your hooks are baited.

Shall we see who bites?



6 Comments Post a comment
  1. Baiting individuals again, Pete? *sigh*

    March 1, 2017
  2. Not at all. If he wants to get a discussion going then I’m just supplying the space. As I said, he doesn’t seem to be able to get anything going at your spot.
    I’ll keep right out if it. Banned. Ok?

    March 1, 2017
  3. Certainly looks like bait from here.

    Happy to be banned if pointing out the obvious is all it takes.

    March 1, 2017
    • You misunderstand … there will be no further word from me … Milongal owns the thread if he wants it.

      March 2, 2017
  4. thedude747 #

    Im on board with all bar points 4 and 5. What is Milongal’s theory ?

    March 5, 2017
  5. Milongal, come on down, join the dogs. Which, by the way, was the name used by MI5 for their fixers.

    March 31, 2017

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s